Thursday, May 12, 2016

Information About Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

By Margaret Bailey


Approaches to surgical operation have changed and evolved widely as a result of technological advancements. The abbreviation SILS is often used for single incision laparoscopic surgery, which is also referred to by man other names. Those other names include single-port access surgery (SPA), Single-port laparoscopy (SPL), and natural-orifice trannsumbilical surgery. Other terms used are one-port umbilical surgery (OPUS), single-port incision-less conventional equipment-using surgery, laparro-endoscopic singular-site surgery (LESS), and single-access endoscopic surgery (SAES).

SILS as a technique under laparoscopic surgery is still a relatively new idea with a rather short history. It falls under minimally invasive techniques of surgical operations because of its use of one incision point. In many patients, the navel serves as the entry point. Small scars are formed from the process. The small size of the scar is among the reasons for high preference of the method by patients and surgeons.

The entry point can be made into a 20 mm or 11mm incision. The importance of utilizing only a single entry point is to minimize pain and scarring. This is opposed to traditional laparoscopic surgical procedure in which multiple entry point are made and used. New York is home to some of the most well-trained and qualified specialists in this kind of procedure. Thus it would be a great place to consider visiting if one needs such a process done to them.

There are two categories of specialized surgical equipment used by SILS. The two broad categories are hand instruments and access ports instruments. Access ports instruments are of various types including the GelPOINT system, QuadPort+, TriPort15, Uni-X, SILS device, and TriPort+. The manufacturers of these instruments are different.

Conversely, there are three key configurations of hand instruments in use. They include articulating, pre-bent rigid, and standard configurations. It has taken over the past thirty years to develop standard hand tools. They are made with rigid design. The SPL reduced triangulation instrument problem was solved by the development of articulation hand instruments.

The choice of whether or not to use articulating or standard instruments usually lies with the surgeons. There are a few factors that influence the decision. Among these influential factors are access port used, cost, and surgical skills of a surgeon. Articulating instruments are very costly when compared to standard instruments. This procedure is made safer and more effective by the use of specialized instruments.

The awareness of SILS among surgical practitioners is at a high level. Despite that fact, the application of SILS is restricted to a small number of surgeons. This is because it is complex, uses specialized instruments, and the space of access is limited. It takes a high level of training and skills to be able to perform the process. That plus many other factors have limited the number of people who engage in the process and it has also promoted a negative outlook from the public.

A wide variety of surgeries makes use of SILS. Common examples comprise of sleeve gastrectomy, colectomy, adjustable gastric banding, appendectomy, nephrectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and hysterectomy among others. In European nations and the US, standard instruments are in wide usage when compared to specialized ones used in many other countries out of these two regions.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment